Explore Ancient History at accredited Level 3. Course level is distinct from the school year in which you study it.
Confirm your cohort: Check the linked course version and school availability for your cohort.
What will I learn?
Historical skills — evidence and communication (Criteria 3 and 4)
Accredited course guide — check versionCriteria 3 and 4 are rated in all three essays, so they reward the same habits everywhere: a thesis-led introduction that uses the question's terms, topic sentences that argue rather than narrate, accurate expression in the past tense and third person, and evidence that is synthesised rather than listed. TASC's assessment reports are blunt that an essay without at least one primary and one secondary source cannot rate above C on Criterion 4, that reputable modern scholars should be named as the subject of a sentence rather than tucked into brackets, and that encyclopaedias and websites are not acceptable sources. Planning a short source list before each essay and pacing the three hours evenly are part of the skill.
Section A — Investigating the Ancient World
Accredited course guide — check versionSection A is historiography through one case study chosen from seven: the Battle of Kadesh, the destruction of Troy, Delphi, Masada, the Roman Games, the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, or the Ziggurats of Mesopotamia. Students learn the chronological and geographical context, the key archaeological and written sources, and the competing interpretations and representations from antiquity to today — for example Ramesses II's victory narrative against modern stalemate readings, or Josephus against Yadin's excavations. The exam rewards analysis of the origin, purpose and context of evidence, the effect of omission, selection and gaps on validity, and a reasoned judgement about which interpretations hold up.
Section B — Structure of an Ancient Society
Accredited course guide — check versionSection B studies the same civilisation's political, social, economic and cultural structures and practices within a defined period (for example Archaic and Early Classical Greece, or Pompeii and Herculaneum for Rome), using at least one key feature as evidence: Arts, Architecture and Drama; Weapons and Warfare; Technology and Engineering; Women and Family; or Beliefs, Rituals and Funerary Practices. Strong essays link a named core element to a key feature through specific events, sites and sources, and show historical context as concrete change over time rather than general attitudes. Markers warn against catalogues of features, leader biographies and modern value judgements.
Section C — The Nature of Power and Authority
Accredited course guide — check versionSection C is a study of human agency through one prescribed individual: Mentuhotep II, Hatshepsut, Akhenaten, Horemheb or Ramesses II; Solon, Cleomenes I, Peisistratus, Themistocles or Thucydides; Cicero, Sulla, Julius Caesar, Livia or Augustus; Liu Bei, Zhuge Liang or Cao Cao; or Tiglath-Pileser, Sargon II or Ashurbanipal. Students examine the nature of power in the society, the individual's background and rise, motivations, methods, relationships, threats, impact and legacy, and how they were depicted in life and judged after death. The exam asks for evaluation — how far the individual shaped their society and how far they were shaped by it — supported by ancient sources and modern scholarship.
How will I be assessed?
School arrangements: TASC course assessment applies to the accredited course and level, whether you take it in Year 11 or Year 12. Check criteria, work requirements and any external assessment in the course document, plus your provider’s internal assessment outline.
Needs verification: Accredited course guide (Ancient History Level 3 (ANH315117), Version 3a (accreditation renewed without amendment on 25 September 2025 as ongoing from 1 January 2026), read with the External Assessment Specifications Version 3 (February 2025). TASC is reviewing Ancient History in Stage 2 of its course review and says a replacement may not be available until 2028, so ANH315117 is expected to continue in 2027.): The external written examination runs for 3 hours of working time with 15 minutes of preparation time beforehand (notes on the supplied note paper and highlighting key words only; the exam starts when the supervisor says so). There is no information sheet, and no notes or texts may be brought in. Each section has ONE compulsory essay question of about 60 minutes, answered in its own booklet with the civilisation letter on the cover. Section A (Criteria 3, 4 and 5) applies a general question to the student's Section A topic: the Battle of Kadesh, the destruction of Troy, Delphi, Masada, the Roman Games, the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, or the Ziggurats of Mesopotamia. Section B (Criteria 3, 4 and 6) is on the same civilisation and must address one or more core elements and at least one key feature. Section C (Criteria 3, 4 and 7) is on one individual from a prescribed list of 21 and may use a different civilisation. Every question requires primary and secondary evidence. TASC does not publish a percentage weighting or raw mark: the paper supplies ratings for Criteria 3–7 and the External Assessment Specifications state that each section carries equal weight. ATARMAxxing's practice papers use an indicative 180-mark scheme (60 marks per section) purely as a study allocation mapped onto those criteria — it is not TASC's grading method, and every practice paper and marking guide says so. Confirm the syllabus and assessment schedule for your own completion year.
Progression and companion subjects
No complete companion or exclusion review is attached to this profile. Check the official course-entry conditions, language eligibility and your school’s sequence before enrolling. Links between resource hubs show related learning; they do not establish a compulsory prerequisite.
Will I find it hard?
Difficulty depends on your experience, interests, teaching and assessment. These are our reflection prompts, not an official difficulty rating.
- Try explaining a case, source or argument with evidence. Does this type of writing interest you?
- Look at the amount of terminology, examples and source material in the sample rather than assuming the subject is easy.
Does it scale up or down?
TASC awards and scaled TE scores are distinct. The old requirement for three final-year results was removed from 2025.
1 more sources
Scaling is not a measure of difficulty or a guaranteed bonus. Prioritise content you can engage with and required subjects for courses you are considering.
Try a little of the subject
How the TASC Ancient History exam works: three essays, five criteria, one civilisation rule
1. The paper at a glance The TASC Ancient History external exam (ANH315117) is a single written paper of three essays . You get 15 minutes of preparation time and then 3 hours of working time . The External Assessment Specifications (EAS, Version 3, February 2025) say the paper has three sections, each taking about 60 minutes, and each section contains one compulsory question . There are no sub-parts, no multiple-choice items, no source extracts to analyse and no internal choice between questions. Question 1 is Section A, Question 2 is Section B and Question 3 is Section C. Each essay goes in its own answer booklet . On the cover you write the question number and the letter for the civilisation you are answering on: E (Egypt), G (Greece), R (Rome), C (China) or A (Assyria). There is no information sheet for this course and no notes or texts are allowed into the room, so every name, date, source and scholar you use has to come from memory. Section Course content Time Criteria rated A (Q1) Investigating the Ancient World: one site, event or era about 60 min 3, 4, 5 B (Q2) Structure of an Ancient Society about 60 min 3, 4, 6 C (Q3) The Nature of Power and Authority: one individual about 60 min 3, 4, 7 Important: the real paper carries no marks . TASC rates each criterion on the extended scale A+ to z. ATARMAxxing's practice papers use an indicative 180-mark scheme (60 per section) only because the EAS says the three sections carry equal weight; those marks are a study tool, not a TASC score. 2. The one-civilisation rule and the freedom in Section C The most expensive administrative mistake in this exam is answering Sections A and B on different civilisations. The EAS is explicit: Sections A and B must address the same civilisation . If you studied Delphi for Section A, you
Original practice question: A student wrote this paragraph in a Section A essay on Masada: Masada was a fortress where the Jews killed themselves rather than surrender. This was very brave. Many people think this is true. Yadin dug it up and found things. Explain what is weak about the paragraph against Criterion 4, then rewrite it so that it integrates at least one primary and one secondary source into an argument.
Show the worked answer
Worked solution
This is ATARMAxxing’s original sample learning material. It is not an official assessment task or a prediction of your school’s workload.
Explore the resources
Open the Ancient History (Level 3) subject hub and free preview
Core subject information and planning are free. Full study resources are optional.
Sources, versions and verification dates
Profile source metadata last checked: 2026-11-14. A source check is not an endorsement by the authority or confirmation that a future course version is unchanged.
- ATARMAxxing Ancient History Level 3 (ANH315117), Version 3a (accreditation renewed without amendment on 25 September 2025 as ongoing from 1 January 2026), read with the External Assessment Specifications Version 3 (February 2025). TASC is reviewing Ancient History in Stage 2 of its course review and says a replacement may not be available until 2028, so ANH315117 is expected to continue in 2027. guide — ATARMAxxing; 2026-11-14. Original existing study guide, not an independent official verification or a forecast of a future syllabus.
- Ancient History ANH315117 — Level 3 — TASC; 2026-11-12. Official source snapshot; Course span 2017 onwards. Check accreditation and school delivery for your cohort.