← Mathematics SpecialistMathematics SpecialistLog in
ATARMAxxing · WACE Year 11 Mathematics Specialist revision notes

Geometry

Unit 1 · Topic 1.1: Geometry
1 · Topic 1.1: Geometry

What this note covers

  1. Logic, quantifiers and proof
  2. Angles on circles and their converses
  3. Chords, tangents and length proofs
  4. Investigation, combined reasoning and verification

4 sections · 5 key terms & formulas · 3 common mistakes

Free sample

A mathematical statement has a truth value within a stated domain. Write P ⇒ Q for “if P, then Q”. This asserts that no case has P true and Q false; it does not assert P. The converse is Q ⇒ P, the inverse is not P ⇒ not Q, and the contrapositive is not Q ⇒ not P. The contrapositive is equivalent to the original implication.

The converse and inverse are equivalent to each other, but need not be equivalent to the original. An equivalence P ⇔ Q requires both directions, often proved separately. Negating P ⇒ Q gives P and not Q, not the inverse.

The quantifier ∀ means “for every”, while ∃ means “there exists”. Always identify the domain: ∀ real x, x² ≥ 0 is true, whereas ∀ real x, x² > 0 fails at zero. Its negation is ∃ real x with x² ≤ 0. Negating an existential statement produces a universal statement with its predicate negated. Several successful examples suggest a conjecture but do not prove a universal claim. A single valid counterexample disproves one.

Check that the counterexample belongs to the specified domain and satisfies the hypothesis.

Worked example. For integers n, let P mean n is divisible by four and Q mean n is even. P ⇒ Q because n = 4k = 2(2k). Its converse says every even integer is divisible by four; n = 6 disproves it. The inverse says an integer not divisible by four is not even, also disproved by six. The contrapositive says an odd integer is not divisible by four and is true. Thus an equivalence would be unjustified. The negation of the original is the existence of an integer divisible by four that is not even; this is false.

Proof by contradiction assumes the negation of the desired conclusion and derives an impossibility from established facts. For example, two distinct lines cannot share two distinct points: if they did, both would be the unique line through those two points, contradicting distinctness. State exactly what is contradicted, then reject the assumption. In geometric proofs, separate given facts from conclusions suggested by a sketch. A drawn right angle is not evidence unless it is specified or established.

When communicating a strategy, name the theorem, identify its hypotheses and give the equation it produces.

Common questions

What does the WACE Year 11 Mathematics Specialist note "Geometry" cover?

This note has 4 sections on Geometry. It includes 5 key terms and formulas, plus 3 common mistakes. It covers 1, Topic 1.1: Geometry. The full section list is shown under “What this note covers”.

Is this WACE Year 11 Mathematics Specialist note free to read?

A sample section is free on the WACE Year 11 Mathematics Specialist hub. Full topic notes unlock with the Mastery Pack, one payment, no subscription.

Included in the WACE Year 11 Mathematics Specialist Mastery Pack

2 original practice exams with worked solutions, 6 revision notes, 60 practice questions and 72 flashcards.

Unlock Mathematics Specialist — $20

Preview a sample note and question free on the WACE Year 11 Mathematics Specialist hub →

WACE Year 11 Mathematics Specialist · revision note 1 of 6